I don't know what I had in mind when I wrote this, since 2017 self
did not bother adding a proper commit message, but 2023 me is pretty
convinced we never want to change the event length when dragging it
around.
Closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/896
They behave slightly differently from smooth scroll events, and
they don't emit 'scroll-begin' nor 'scroll-end', so we have to
execute that the callbacks of these signals do inside the scroll
callback itself.
GtkSpinner queues relayouts even when the stack is not displaying
it, and this causes excessive redrawing. This button design looks
obsolete and should eventually be reworked, but for now, let's
just stop spinning when the spinner is invisible.
Closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/971
The people who introduced this code were not careful enough to
make sure the code they removed from GcalWindow was added back
in GcalToolbarEnd.
They also simply commented out some code instead of properly
reimplementing that.
I regret having trusted their code :(
Closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/880
The implementation of the credentials popover has relied on a hack,
and sadly this hack doesn't work anymore.
It's too late for a redesign, so for now, just put it into a dialog
and show it on top of the calendar management dialog.
This is to show how much I suck at reviewing code. Look at this
massive gold nugget of garbage. Nobody on their serious mind would
have let that pass code review.
But I did. And now I deserve the punishment to deal with this.
Of course, the author didn't seem to have spared more than a fraction
of a second of their brain power to even consider what they were
doing here. But that's what code review is for - preventing garbage
like this from landing. And yet, here we are, removing an invisible
Week view from the sidebar.
These are still hardcoded instead of measuring the available space,
but it's better than nothing in the meantime.
Decent WMs size the window correctly if width/height exceed the screen.
Also, allow the Notes field to expand vertically, to fill the space.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/602
Mnemonics are useful for navigating through the interface more easily,
besides improving the accessibility. Since the calendar button is an
important button for using the application, it is interesting to have
a mnemonic associated with its label.
Using the letter C for this label seems reasoable, since there is no
conflict with the labels simulteneously active in the application, and
it is easy to remember.
Users should be able to navigate through the interface ideally using
only the keyboard, as specified in the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines.
This however is currently possible in the window page with shortcuts
when it comes to switching among week and month views, and jumping to
today's date. It is also interesting to have access keys attached to
such labels, so that the user does not need to look for the keyboard
shortcuts.
Using the first letter for each of the labels as mnemonics suffices in
this case, since there is no conflict, none of them is a thin letter nor
has descenders, and they are easy to remember.
The GcalDateSelector returns an internal instance, while the 'until' date/time
is meant to be an own instance, which is freed by the GcalRecurrence instance
in its free function. That means the 'until' date/time is supposed to be reffed
when being assigned into the GcalRecurrence structure.
Closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/892
When a recurrent event is edited, we now are able to only offer the
MOD_ALL option when it actually will work. However, we're still left
with the problem that we end up applying the instance-specific data
onto the main event, through an old hack.
The views already aren't able to offer the MOD_ALL property, since
they all change the dates of events, but GcalEventEditorDialog can,
and it must handle that properly.
For now, do the simplest possible approach, which is: retrive the
template event and apply all properties that can be applied to it,
without letting the start and end days leak into it. We already only
allow passing MOD_ALL on situations where the dates aren't really
modified, so it should be safe.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/882
We get into seriously tricky situations if we try and change the
date & time of an event with recurrency, and pass MOD_ALL. That's
because it is ambioguous *where* the change must be applied.
Don't allow selecting MOD_ALL when the scheduling of the recurrent
event changes.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/882
The only field that views may change using DnD is the start date
field (and, consequently, the end date), and that's exactly what
we must not show the MOD_ALL option for.
Don't show it.
Related: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/882
Every once in a while when I'm deleting an event gnome-calendar crashes.
I dug in a bit, and it seems the reason is
adw_toast_overlay_add_toast takes ownership of the passed in reference.
This is a little idiosyncratic for something that's not GInitiallyUnowned,
but it appears to be the API nonetheless.
GCalWindow assumes it owns the reference.
This commit makes both users of the toast happy by adding a ref call.
Every event in RTL languages is drawn in the
wrong place. As a result the week view is totally unusable.
Fix this.
#817
Signed-off-by: Yosef Or Boczko <yoseforb@gmail.com>
When running under valgrind, it claims that there's used uninitialized
memory, which is set as GObject property in the code. It's for
GtkLabel::xalign. The problem was that the value in the code is
an integer, but the property itself expects float type. This fixes
the place and where a floating point is already used it annotates
the value to be float, not a double.
Cannot use g_clear_pointer() here, because it unsets the pointer first and
only then calls the free function, which means the test on self->delete_event_toast
NULL-ness would be satisfied in the on_toast_dismissed_cb(), thus the previous
event delete attempt would be "cancelled" internally.
Closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/858
