Federated_Computer/enterprise.federated.computer
0
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Updated enterprise documentation

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
carly
2026-05-28 11:40:39 -06:00
parent ae5b6caa73
commit 6886206922
12 changed files with 157 additions and 48 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
content/docs/enterprise/reference/tier-comparison.md
View File

@@ -54,4 +54,10 @@ To illustrate the difference between tiers, here are example monthly costs for a
- **Consultant:** $200 membership + (10 × $15) = **$350/mo**
- **Pay-As-You-Go:** $0 membership + (10 × $55) = **$550/mo**
At higher Core counts, Enterprise becomes more economical due to its lower per-Core rate. At very low Core counts (1–3 Cores), Pay-As-You-Go or Consultant may be more cost-effective than paying the Enterprise membership fee.
The most cost-effective tier depends on how many Cores you run:
- **1–4 Cores:** Pay-As-You-Go is cheapest — no membership fee offsets the higher per-Core rate at low volume.
- **5–39 Cores:** Consultant is cheapest — the $200 membership fee is recovered through lower per-Core pricing compared to Pay-As-You-Go.
- **40+ Cores:** Enterprise is cheapest — the crossover point where the $10/Core rate makes the $400 membership fee worthwhile.
These breakpoints assume no add-ons. Add-on pricing also varies by tier, so accounts with heavy add-on usage may find the breakeven shifts in favor of a higher tier sooner.